![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.envirotronconverter.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Captura-de-pantalla-2024-08-04-a-las-23.41.35-1024x116.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nThe tests were carried out on a 2005 model Ford focus car with a mileage of 226851, these tests were carried out by gravity from a height of 2.50 meters at idle, without device <\/strong>obtaining an idle consumption of 500 milliliters in a time of 24 minutes 34 seconds and a second test of 1000 milliliters with a time of 48 minutes 12 seconds and with device, <\/strong>Taking care to have the same characteristics already mentioned, the result was obtained with 500 milliliters 25 minutes 44 seconds, increasing 1 minute 44 seconds of performance, with 1000 milliliters 53 minutes 40 seconds, increasing 5 minutes 28 seconds, this indicates that for each minute that passes In this car the fuel saved is 2 milliliters; The gasoline tank being 55 liters (according to the manufacturer's manual) with the device it will have a performance of 5 more hours of performance which is equivalent to 5700 milliliters or 5.7 liters per fuel tank, which is equivalent to a 10.3% savings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The tests were carried out on a Volkswagen Jetta model 2009 with a mileage of 255062, using a gasoline pump taking as reference 15 minutes of time that it was working in idle mode, consuming without device <\/strong>310 milliliters and with device <\/strong>272 milliliters having a fuel saving of 2.5 milliliters per minute elapsed, with the tank being 55 liters (according to the manufacturer's manual) with the device it will have a performance of 6 hours more performance which is equivalent to 6526.8 milliliters or 6.3 liters per fuel tank , which is equivalent to 11.4% savings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2009 VW JETTA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 2017 NISSAN SENTRA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 2018 NISSAN VERSA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" PRUEBA DE RENDIMIENTO DE COMBUSTIBLE Las pruebas se realizaron con combustible magna de 87 octanos Las pruebas se realizaron en un autom\u00f3vil Ford focus modelo 2005 con un kilometraje de 226851, dichas pruebas se realizaron por gravedad desde una altura de 2.50 metros en ralent\u00ed, sin dispositivo obteniendo un consumo el ralent\u00ed de 500 mililitros … <\/p>\n<\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td><\/tr> <\/td> CO<\/td> HCNM<\/td> NO<\/td><\/tr> WITHOUT<\/td> 4.884<\/td> 0.1502<\/td> 0.684<\/td><\/tr> WITH<\/td> 3.11<\/td> 0.1052<\/td> 0.533<\/td><\/tr> DIFFERENCE<\/td> -36.32%<\/td> -29.96%<\/td> -22.06%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td><\/tr> <\/td> CO<\/td> HCNM<\/td> NO<\/td><\/tr> WITHOUT<\/td> 1.899<\/td> 0.0312<\/td> 0.075<\/td><\/tr> WITH<\/td> 1.407<\/td> 0.0285<\/td> 0.069<\/td><\/tr> DIFFERENCE<\/td> -25.91%<\/td> -8.81%<\/td> -8.00%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td><\/tr> <\/td> CO<\/td> HCNM<\/td> NO<\/td><\/tr> WITHOUT<\/td> 1.011<\/td> 0.0351<\/td> 0.049<\/td><\/tr> WITH<\/td> 0.786<\/td> 0.025<\/td> 0.032<\/td><\/tr> DIFFERENCE<\/td> -22.26%<\/td> -28.77%<\/td> -34.69%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n